Manchester City's first penalty in their 5-1 win over Wolves last Saturday should not have stood, an independent panel has concluded.
Key refereeing decisions from each round of Premier League fixtures are reviewed by the Key Match Incident Panel (KMIP), which is made up of three former players or coaches, one Premier League representative and one from the PGMOL.
Looking back on the events of last weekend, the KMIP voted by a 3-2 majority that referee Craig Pawson wrongly awarded a spot-kick for Rayan Ait-Nouri's challenge on Josko Gvardiol. The pair collided inside the area, which appeared to be unintentional, thoughCity were given a penalty to go 1-0 in the game and duly scored.
Explaining why this was the wrong call, the KMIP described the incident as a «coming together due to the normal actions of both players and the challenge is not reckless». All five individuals agreed VAR was correct not to intervene, however.
Two contentious calls inArsenal's win over Bournemouth were also debated: the penalty awarded to Arsenal for a foul on Kai Havertz and the Cherries' disallowed goal.
Referee David Coote was supported 3-2 in his decision to penalise goalkeeper Mark Travers for bringing down Havertz. Those in support of Havertz argued «feet first, doesn't win the ball and fouls the attacker», with those disagreeing stating «Havertz leaves his leg in the challenge to initiate contact and has time to jump to evade the challenge».
Arsenal U21 coach reveals the secret behind Nwaneri and Cozier-Duberry success this season
Mikel Arteta admits Arsenal team news 'doubts' ahead of Manchester United
Coote's verdict that Dominic Solanke fouled David Raya before Antoine Semenyo fired into an empty net was also backed by a score of 3-2
Read on football.london