Man Utd legends react to possible Old Trafford exit

Legendary figures at Manchester United are split over whether or not Sir Jim Ratcliffe should look to move the club into a modernised version of Old Trafford dubbed the 'Wembley of the north'.

Reports emerged on Tuesday that INEOS chief Ratcliffe wants to transform United's home into a state-of-the-art venue, increasing the capacity of the stadium to around 90,000.

It's been suggested that Ratcliffe may lobby the UK Government for stadium funding in light of their Levelling Up commitments, with revealing that dialogue has already been opened with Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham.

The existing Old Trafford opened in February 1910 but has not undergone any renovation work since 2006, when both quadrants adjacent to the North Stand were added to in order to bring the capacity up to 76,000. A leaking roof, crammed concourses and faded paintwork are just some of the current issues.

There's been widespread debate over whether United should look to build a new home from scratch and move to a new site, redevelop Old Trafford in its existing location or rebuild on the same patch of land — like Tottenham Hotspur did.

«I hate to say it because I never thought I’d see the day when I would say, ‘Leave Old Trafford’, but the idea of putting a purpose-built, state-of-the-art stadium next door is appealing,» former centre-back Gary Pallister told .

«As fantastic a stadium as it is — and it’s not as bad as some people have made out — to make it the Wembley of the north might be the way forward.

»It could cost £2bn to build, which is mind-blowing. But as a player and supporter, to go into a brand-new stadium like Tottenham have got, maybe that’s the step we have to take if we want to keep our place at the top table and be spoken about as